I’ve always had an affinity for what I would call the noble second-in-command. Time and again, in history and in literature, my favorite personalities aren’t the heroes and kings, but those standing steadfastly beside them. I don’t know why, exactly. Maybe it has to do with my natural disposition, or my concept of leadership. Whatever the case, it’s there.
Take Lord of the Rings, for example. My favorite character isn’t Frodo, or Aragorn, or Gandalf, it’s Sam (followed closely by Faramir – another second-in-command). I prefer Marcus Agrippa to Augustus, Achates to Aeneas, Sherman to Grant. These characters – real and fictional – were all content, happy even, to play second fiddle. Perhaps recognizing their own weaknesses, they never moved to supplant those they supported, even when power was within their grasp.
It’s this affinity for the second-in-command that draws me to Belisarius. Here was an honest man, a brilliant general, who served his at time thankless, at times jealous emperor with loyalty and dedication. Had he been so inclined, he could have rebelled against Justinian, or defected and established his own kingdom in Italy. God knows he had cause. But he never wavered.
That complicated relationship between Belisarius and Justinian is what inspired me to write about him. As I progess through the research, I’m finding more fascinating relationships, such as those between Belisarius and his unfaithful wife, Antonina, or his disaffected secretary, Procopius, but it’s the relationship between second-in-command Belisarius and his emperor that will form the narrative thread of the story.